Skip to content

The Lindley Report

July 11, 2009

Firstly we do not know anything  about Adele or Adam Lindley other than that they breed Goldendoodle’s and that Adele is the Manager, CEO and Training Executive of  Disability Aid Dogs Pty Ltd. (DAD) (not Disabled Aid Dogs International Pty Ltd as Beverley has posted on the Rutland Manor site).

By all accounts the Lindley’s are reputable breeders and have a good reputation.

We did not expect the Lindley’s to find Rutland Manor in its usual state as the RM staff had spent the week prior to the Lindley’s visit frantically cleaning the kennels and sprucing up the garden, strategically placing pot plants here and there. The dog’s coats were groomed and all the mats shaved off.

However nowhere in their subjective report does it mention the topic of debarking.

We know Adele and Adam are aware that the Rutland manor dogs have been debarked because they were there; they told everyone all about the “scrumptious” dogs they wanted to take home. So surely they would have heard the dog’s pitiful attempts to bark.

If Adele and Adam Lindley are prepared state here or on any other website forum that the Rutland Manor dogs have not been debarked, we will publicly apologies to Beverley Manners immediately.

Over to you Adele and Adam.

Advertisements
7 Comments leave one →
  1. heike permalink
    July 12, 2009 4:36 am

    After the DAD and RSPCA inspections wouldn’t they have noticed if the dogs were indeed “debarked”??

  2. stoprutlandmanor permalink*
    July 12, 2009 5:48 am

    Thank you Heike and welcome,
    Yes we believe you are right. That is why we have invited DAD (Adele and Adam) to confirm. The RSPCA we believe have not released their report as yet.
    Thanks

  3. Lisa Ryan permalink
    July 12, 2009 2:00 pm

    One of the most heart breaking sounds I have ever heard is that of a debarked dog trying to communicate. It takes away their ability to express anything including being just being happy to see you. Beverley can you and your staff who all profess to love these dogs understand the cruelty and wrong of your actions – your staff who are actually the ones who spend their days with these dogs and know their individual personalities. How could you stand by and continue to stand by and watch this suffering, how could anyone stand by and not say anything.

  4. heike permalink
    July 18, 2009 9:40 am

    vist the NAIA on this issue, you don’t know of what you speak!! Anyway, this is a false accusation with no proof!!

  5. StopRutlandManor permalink
    July 18, 2009 10:37 am

    Thanks Heike,
    The NAIA is based in your homeland, USA. They have no relevance on Australian law and legislation.
    We do not publish anything on this site unless we have evidence, so please don’t make statements that we are falsely accusing Rutland Manor of anything.
    Rutland Manor has debarked their dogs, this is a FACT.
    Heike if you have evidence that RM have not debarked their dogs please provide this and we will apologies to you.
    We are still waiting for the Lindley’s to also provide this information and “exonerate” Rutland Manor
    Thank you

  6. luvmydoodles permalink
    July 26, 2009 11:08 am

    http://www.rutlandmanor.com/pages/home/rutland-manor-exonerated.php

    Mrs Adele Lindley
    PIAA (Pet Industry Association of Australia) Membership No:PO90154
    CEO: Disability Aid Dogs Pty Ltd (International)- DAD
    Manager Disability Aid Dogs Pty Ltd (International)- DAD
    Fully Accredited International Trainer and Accreditation Officer
    Qualified International Disability Aid Dogs Trainer Level 5
    Qualified International Temperament Accreditation Assessor

    All these qualifications are PRINT YOUR OWN apart from the Pet Industry of Australia membership, which just demonstrates that she sells puppies.
    This doesn’t impress me. Were dogs mated while Adele Lindley was inspecting Rutland Manor?
    Who is Adele Lindley, anyway? Or DAD?

  7. Lisa Ryan permalink
    July 31, 2009 8:12 am

    Oh Beverley – how did you get so carried away with you own self importance ?

    In reply to you self-proclaimed greatness as per http://www.rutlandmanor.com/pages/rm-difference.php

    With the example of honesty, integrity and a respect for the law your father had, where did you go wrong ?

    With all your experience with dogs, why can’t you still tell the difference between a Poodle, a Labrador, a Shitzu and whatever else you have tucked away ?

    One of your most recent litters – (sired by Tux who you yourself stated is a Standard Poodle), cannot be claimed to be a Labradoodle litter – it is very obviously half Labradoodle or something similar, and half Poodle. What are these offspring classed as on their pedigrees ?

    Your deep and abiding love for all God’s Creatures obviously does not extend to dogs.

    You were not the first in the world to introduce DNA profiling at all, nor were you the first in the world to advocate & practice mandatory health testing for any breed. You mention some vague reference to PenHIPP screening, what about PRA screening for which Poodles are well known to suffer and pass on to their offspring. Do your puppy purchasers get copies of the health screening results of the breeding stock used to produce their puppies ?

    Your methods for preparing and socialising puppies and your so called unique temperament testing processes are not unique or new – all responsible registered breeders do this and have been doing this for longer than you have been around.

    Your reputation for matching puppies and families on an individual and caring basis is based on who pays the highest dollar amount and the same applies for the older dogs you off load for more breeding. Your reputation is a complete fallacy in your own mind and in the minds of those who cannot think for themselves.

    Your claim for “the need to track pedigrees and so she co-founded the first registry for the Australian Labradoodle (The LAA in Australia) and founded the first global registry for the Australian Labradoodle (the ILA) from both of which Rutland Manor has since found the need to disassociate itself as they do not share its vision for the continuing future of the breed” is another complete distortion of the truth. Pedigrees have been around for a couple of hundred years with pure bred dogs. Your pedigrees are yet to be tested/verified by any legitimate body (other than those you compile/construct yourself) and your disassociation with the LAA and ILA is for reasons other than what you state.

    In spite of all your claims, you are still just a very deluded individual and still just a cruel and greedy puppy farmer in it for the big bucks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: